Metamask Expands with Connext for Cross-Chain Bridges

0

[ad_1]

Metamask has introduced new cross-chain bridges, made possible through the implementation of the Connext protocol.

Users who want to move tokens across chains are now able to select Connext network bridges from Metamask’s bridge aggregator.

From Metamask Bridge, users can now see Connext quotes for bridge requests. Connections across Ethereum Mainnet, Polygon, BNB Chain, Optimism, and Arbitrum are all included.

First launched in November 2022, Metamask Bridges empowers users to make cross-chain swaps directly from their wallets.

Alongside Connext, participating bridge providers include Hop, Celer cBridge, and Polygon. When users wish to swap tokens on one blockchain for their equivalents on another, they receive quotes from each available bridge. They can then choose their preferred option.

As multi- and cross-chain technologies have exploded in recent years, bridging solutions like those provided by Connext have emerged as critical enabling technologies. But unfortunately, a string of high-profile hacks shone a light on the security vulnerabilities of many bridges.

Metamask’s solution to the security challenges faced by cross-chain bridges is to offer its users a choice of bridge providers. As well as vetting the different technologies available, the company also gives users greater choice over who to trust by providing different options.

Connext Sees Surge in Cross-Chain Activity 

It may not be the most established player in the space. But in a short amount of time, Connext has attracted a notable community of users and developers. 

In a press release announcing the close of a $7.5 million USD funding round that values the company at $250 million, Connext reported that over 1.2 million cross-chain transactions have passed through its network. 

Since the launch of its V2 in February, the network has grown rapidly. Alongside Metamask, Connext now counts the likes of Planet IX, and DODO among the companies that are building with its technology.

Decentralized Exchanges Embrace Bridges

With an expanding array of solutions to blockchain fragmentation now available, it isn’t just wallet providers exploring different bridge options. 

As it explores its multichain possibilities, the decentralized exchange Uniswap has also investigated different bridging solutions. And the Uniswap Foundation recently published a report that endorses two bridge providers for potential cross-chain deployments.

Uniswap’s Bridge Assessment Committee was established following a heated debate among stakeholders in the run-up to the exchange’s deployment on the BNB chain. 

The proposal to do so using Wormhole eventually passed, but not with a strong majority. There were approximately 56,000 votes in favor versus around 28,000 against.

As the committee’s report explained, “the discussion preceding the vote made it clear that cross-chain messaging and the protocols that enable it occupy a nascent and complex design space.”

Uniswap Endorses Wormhole and Axelar Bridges

Having assessed the merits of different bridging solutions, the dedicated committee has concluded that the “Wormhole and Axelar bridges are currently suitable for use by the DAO [in] future cross-chain deployments.”

However, it advises the community to continuously review them both as well as other bridge providers on an ongoing basis.

Finally, other decentralized exchanges, such as Pancakeswap, are also embracing multi-chain deployments. And going forward, cross-chain transport and messaging protocols are increasingly critical to the DeFi ecosystem.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 0.000000
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 0.000000
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.000000
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 0.000000
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.000000
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.000000
solana
Wrapped SOL (SOL) $ 0.000000
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.000000
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 0.000000
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.000000
figure-heloc
Figure Heloc (FIGR_HELOC) $ 0.000000
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.000000
whitebit
WhiteBIT Coin (WBT) $ 0.000000
wrapped-steth
Wrapped stETH (WSTETH) $ 0.000000
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 0.000000
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 0.000000
wrapped-beacon-eth
Wrapped Beacon ETH (WBETH) $ 0.000000
usds
USDS (USDS) $ 0.000000
binance-bridged-usdt-bnb-smart-chain
Binance Bridged USDT (BNB Smart Chain) (BSC-USD) $ 0.000000
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 0.000000
wrapped-eeth
Wrapped eETH (WEETH) $ 0.000000
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 0.000000
weth
WETH (WETH) $ 0.000000
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 0.000000
hyperliquid
Hyperliquid (HYPE) $ 0.000000
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.000000
zcash
Zcash (ZEC) $ 0.000000
ethena-usde
Ethena USDe (USDE) $ 0.000000
coinbase-wrapped-btc
Coinbase Wrapped BTC (CBBTC) $ 0.000000
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 0.000000
sui
Sui (SUI) $ 0.000000
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 0.000000
hedera-hashgraph
Hedera (HBAR) $ 0.000000
usdt0
USDT0 (USDT0) $ 0.000000
susds
sUSDS (SUSDS) $ 0.000000
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000000
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 0.000000
mantle
Mantle (MNT) $ 0.000000
paypal-usd
PayPal USD (PYUSD) $ 0.000000
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 0.000000
world-liberty-financial
World Liberty Financial (WLFI) $ 0.000000
crypto-com-chain
Cronos (CRO) $ 0.000000
ethena-staked-usde
Ethena Staked USDe (SUSDE) $ 0.000000
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 0.000000
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 0.000000
memecore
MemeCore (M) $ 0.000000
aave
Aave (AAVE) $ 0.000000
usd1-wlfi
USD1 (USD1) $ 0.000000
rain
Rain (RAIN) $ 0.000000
canton-network
Canton (CC) $ 0.000000
Shares